American Apparel photography style

Swedish blogger Emelie Eriksson happens to be pointing out the extreme comparison on her behalf blog site (which was picked up by company Insider), and we're perhaps not pointing fingers but here are photographs of shattered windows on Stockholm storefronts, that the business tells us had been broken by protesters:

"US attire is extremely sensitive to gender and intimate issues, equally we have been to problems like immigration and homosexual relationship. In this instance, the actual item model photo for this unisex item is completely clothed for females, as it's for males. Sadly, some bloggers have actually confused an artistic photoshoot which accompany all pages and posts with something chance and a controversy erupted consequently."

LOL silly bloggers don't get art.

Are the male outtakes art, too? They appear like they are not art but what do we understand.

The US Apparel representative also informed united states that, duh, the organization "is well-known for its provocative imagery, artistic photographs and its stance on no-cost appearance in the manner business. Our design intentionally eschews the photoshopped and impossibly unreal looks of numerous of your competitors. We do not think there's any such thing during these photos regarding synch with your standards and we also think they portray the garments additionally the designs in a stylish way consequently they are not even the slightest bit discriminatory. Clearly we would never look for to upset anybody and now we're sorry to anybody who is annoyed."