American attire models. Picture / Supplied.
Bright and breezy, a little sleazy, US Apparel the most recognisable companies regarding the high-street, whichever side of the Atlantic you are on. The Los Angeles-based store of monochrome closet essentials and style tchotchkes has courted scandal because assiduously whilst courts its core demographic of waify teenagers and twentysomethings. After many years of headlines about sexually charged advertising and accusations of sexual harassment on the part of their eccentric creator, Dov Charney, American Apparel looks like it is taking place how it emerged: in a blaze of debate.
Charney and his managers are at the centre of a new furore in america over their particular hiring guidelines for store staff, an ongoing process that - we discovered recently - has more in common with casting a runway style show than selecting a group of till-ringers. Revelations that possible staff members must submit "head-to-toe" pictures of themselves should they even want to be considered have actually spawned a whole new round of tut-tutting and accusations of discrimination.
This stress is approximately the very last thing the business wishes right now, as it features properly 18 times to avert personal bankruptcy. The financiers whom lent the company the amount of money for its ragweed development are actually into the driving chair. Charney founded the organization 13 years back. Today he has only a little over half it - but he may well perhaps not after the end associated with month.
It's impossible to state if there is a straight-line from the salacious gossip - generally culled from sensational legal actions that the organization attracts - into financial peril in which United states Apparel finds it self, but anywhere near this much is clear: it really is no further the greatest destination to shop. An equally brilliant and breezy foreign interloper, Uniqlo, is broadening fast on its residence turf; H&M and Zara tend to be humming with bargain-hunting fashionistas, hip to types that change in those stores quicker than they previously transform at an American attire.
Charney's cherished business model - their decision which will make all of the clothes at HQ in l . a . instead of in affordable countries such as for example China, as encapsulated in the motto "sweatshop free" - is nearing a crossroads. The slip in sales and, now, the failure to rebound from recession such as the other countries in the high street is a bitter blow. Until recently, amid all the controversies, the creator could at the least suggest the numbers and say he needs to be performing one thing right. So what does he say now?
"Things should get together... We are able to get into an optimistic destination, " he sheepishly told Wall Street analysts after the company disclosed its economic precariousness final thirty days. "i will be motivated. I'm working 7 days a week. I am hoping to make everyone proud and I appreciate everybody's persistence."
Proceeded under.
Relevant Content
Less than four weeks after those remarks comes the latest controversy over staffing guidelines. An innovative new York blog site which has had long been a thorn in the organization's side revived recommendations that head office will demand the sacking of unsightly personnel. In a new perspective, Gawker disclosed that applicants must get approval from executives based on a picture which, according to an inside memo, needs to be a "full-body head-to-toe" shot.
Simply put, no uglies. Moreover it reported statements from previous employees that store managers could be required to occasionally send staff photos for conversation by executives - with team members becoming evaluated on the appearance and clothes.
The story produced a flurry of communication from previous staff members. One former manager ended up being told not to employ "trashy" black colored women, just "tasteful black girls, with great tresses, you know". An ex-staff user typed: "not just performed they police our clothing but our eyebrows, makeup, fingernails and hair color. Our shop consultant also on several occasions told women to lose weight or informed them they were 'too top-heavy for crop tops'. They consistently denied programs according to appearances or shoes."
United states Apparel has gone only so far to reject the accusations. All things considered, this is a business that promotes brand-new job openings by hosting what it describes as an "open call" at a shop, just as if its a modelling audition in the place of a job interview. It admits that "we do display screen, although not for beauty. Everything we search for is personal style."
Li'l Sebastian